What Exactly Has Gone Wrong at Zipcar – and the UK Car-Sharing Sector Dead?

The volunteer food project in Rotherhithe has been delivering a large number of cooked meals weekly for the past two years to pensioners and needy locals in southeast London. However, their operations have been thrown into disarray by the announcement that they will lose cars and vans on New Year’s Day.

The group depended on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that customers to access its fleet of vehicles via smartphone. It caused shock across London when it said it would shut down its UK business from 1 January.

This means many volunteers will be unable to collect food from the Felix Project, which gathers surplus food from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Other options are less convenient, costlier, or do not offer the same flexible hours.

“The impact will be massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “Personally me and my team are worried about the logistical challenge we will face. A lot of people like ours will face difficulties.”

“Knowing the reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Significant Setback for City Vehicle Clubs

These volunteers are among more than half a million people in London who were car club members, who could be left without easy use to vehicles, without the hassle and cost of ownership. Most of those people were likely with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

The planned closure, subject to consultation with employees, is a big blow to the vision that car sharing in urban areas could reduce the need for private vehicle ownership. Yet, some analysts have noted that Zipcar’s exit need not spell the end for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Shared Mobility

Shared vehicle use is prized by city planners and environmentalists as a way of mitigating the ills linked to vehicle ownership. Typically, vehicles sit as two-tonne dead weights on the street for 95% of the time, occupying parking. They also require large carbon emissions to produce, and people without a vehicle tend to walk, cycle and take transit more. That helps urban areas – easing congestion and pollution – and improves people’s health through more exercise.

Understanding the Decline

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues were minimal compared with its parent company's total earnings, and a loss that reached £11.7m in 2024 gave little incentive to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our international business, where we are taking deliberate steps to streamline operations, enhance profitability”.

Its latest financial reports noted revenues had fallen as drivers took fewer and shorter trips. “These changes reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which is dampening demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

London's Unique Challenges

However, several experts noted that London has specific problems that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.

  • Patchwork Policies: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a patchwork of different procedures and prices that made it harder.
  • New Costs: The closure comes as electric cars becoming liable for London’s congestion charge, adding extra expenses.
  • Unequal Parking Fees: Residents in some boroughs pay just £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A similar shared vehicle would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a significant barrier.

“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” argued Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We introduce cleaner models in their place.”

Lessons from Abroad

Nations in Europe offer models for London to follow. Germany introduced national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a nationwide framework for parking, subsidies and waivers. Now, the country has several shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK trails at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that car sharing around the world, especially in Europe, is growing,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

He suggested authorities should start to view vehicle clubs as a form of public transport, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was already seriously considering entering the London market: “Operators will fill this gap.”

What Comes Next?

Other players can be split into two models:

  1. Fleet Operators: Which maintain their own cars. Examples Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – similar to Airbnb for cars. Players include Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

One company, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK managing director, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take some time for other players to establish themselves. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and many across London will be left without access.

For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the next month will be a scramble to find a way. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.

Jasmine Silva DVM
Jasmine Silva DVM

A seasoned legal journalist with over a decade of experience covering court cases and legislative changes.