🔗 Share this article

No fewer than eleven jurisdictions and two territories have agreed to a recent directive from the federal government to remove references of gender identity and the presence of trans and non-binary people from a federal sexual health program, authorities stated.

The administration set a Monday deadline for removing these references, threatening the loss of substantial government funding. Nearly all of the agreeing jurisdictions have GOP-led state legislatures and mostly Republican governors.

Court Battles and Financial Conflicts

Sixteen other states and Washington DC have initiated legal action challenging the government's requirement, claiming it violates legislative power, which established the $75 million sex education program, known as the PREP initiative.

All jurisdictions participating in the lawsuit are governed by Democrat state executives.

In a late Monday court order, a U.S. judge blocked the HHS agency, which oversees the program, from withholding funding to the suing jurisdictions if they do not adhere.

“The agency does not demonstrate that the new grant conditions are reasonable, let alone offer any valid reason, other than an excuse, for its actions,” wrote Ann Aiken, a U.S. district judge in the state. “The department offers no proof that it made informed determinations or took into account the legal goals.”

Program Goals and Government Scrutiny

Prep seeks to educate adolescents on positive interactions and how to prevent unplanned parenthood and the spread of sexually transmitted infections.

In April, the federal government demanded all jurisdictions receiving Prep funds to provide a version of their curriculum to the department and its agency, the ACF office, for a health content assessment.

By late summer, the administration sent letters to 46 states and territories, stating that, during the review, it had found “material in the curricula that deviate from the scope of the program's legal framework.”

In particular, the government claimed it had uncovered evidence of “gender ideology,” a phrase often used by conservative factions to describe the notion that gender is a changeable cultural concept and that transgender individuals exist.

Specific Examples of Required Alterations

The administration directed one state to drop a lesson that stated: “Adolescents may express themselves in ways that don’t conform with their assigned gender.”

It instructed North Carolina to eliminate a line from a educational module that stated: “Individuals regardless of identity need to know how to avoid unplanned pregnancy and infections.”

Additionally, sex educators in many jurisdictions could no longer be instructed to “show tolerance and understanding for all participants, regardless of personal characteristics, including ethnicity, heritage, religion, social class, sexual orientation or identity,” according to the letters sent to states.

Official Statements and State Responses

“Oversight is imminent,” declared Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary of the ACF office, in a statement. “Federal funds will not be used to negatively influence of the next generation or promote harmful political doctrines.”

Several states and territories confirmed they would eliminate the references or had already done so. These consist of Alaska, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Wyoming, as well as the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Two other states, the states, reported their Prep curricula never included the terminology mentioned in the government's notices.

Impact on Youth and Psychological Well-being

Collectively, these states are inhabited by more than 120k transgender individuals between the ages of 13 and 17, according to estimates from a university department.

“When the aim is to support youth and give them a secure environment, I’m not sure why we are stomping on the most vulnerable youth in the population,” said an advocate, who heads Rise that offers health instruction in Tennessee.

“If authorities state that there’s something incorrect about you and the educators aren’t allowed to provide information or they have to disclose your identity to family – when you know that that’s not safe – that’s horrible for mental health.”

Nearly half of transgender adolescents seriously considered suicide in the past year, according to a recent study from a mental health organization. School support for these adolescents is linked to lower rates of attempted suicide, the group discovered.

Previous Actions and Continuing Conflicts

Earlier this year, the federal government instructed California to cut mentions to transgender topics from its educational program.

When the jurisdiction refused, the government withdrew its funding, cutting about $12 million in government money and stopping sex education programs in schools, youth centers and group homes for foster children.

The state agency is challenging the withdrawal. To date, it has been unsuccessful in make up for the lost funding.

The government has also informed educators who obtain funding from additional national programs, the $50 million Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE) and the $101 million TPPP initiative, that they cannot teach about “gender-related concepts.”

An recent judicial ruling prevented the administration from changing one program, while the latest ruling prohibits it from changing the other program in the suing jurisdictions that challenged Prep.

The Administration for Children and Families did not provide a prompt reply to a inquiry.